Post by JTEMPost by RonONo news sources are commenting on the CDC findings that
Get your vaccine and 19 booster shots.
It's just coincidence that a virus exactly mirrors the
long term policy goals of eliminating beef & dairy from
Agree. Believe. Comply.
"Eat weed & maggot sausage, for the environment!"
You do not seem to understand what the situation is. If anything the
USDA and CDC are not doing what they should have been doing from the
start of this issue because they want to protect the cattle industry.
They are doing it at the expense of the poultry industry because there
are more votes that need to be considered in the cattle industry than
the poultry industry. The price of eggs is going to go up because dairy
herds have been infecting layer flocks, probably because they share
workers. Some dairy workers and their close contacts work at poultry
farms. They do not want to hurt the cattle industry economically, so
they have downplayed the situation, and never have determined how bad
the situation is (how many states have infected herds and how many
infected herds there actually are). They know that the best way to
avoid the transition of influenza virus to being pathogenic to humans
has been to reduce dairy worker infections, but they never tried to
determine how many dairy workers were infected, and have just
recommended that dairy workers use protective gear when working with
infected animals. They have never tried to identify all the infected
herds so the dairy workers would know when they should be using
protective gear.
Both agencies have just hoped that the virus will burn itself out before
it transfers to humans, but California and Colorado indicates that they
are very wrong.
The latest pasteurization data hasn't been made a big deal of because
they do not want to economically damage the dairy industry. The FDA
knows that the virus can be found in milk in states that have not
reported infected herds, and California indicates that a lot of infected
milk is making it into dairy products. They haven't identified all the
infected herds yet, and they claim that infected cattle are not allowed
to contributed to the milk sold by the dairy, but they have to identify
the cows as infected. They need to test every cow at infected dairies,
and clear them before they are allowed to contribute to the milk supply.
The Texasd data that has been ignored by the CDC and USDA found that
even though only 10% of a herd might be showing symptoms 64% of the
samples tested from 2 farms were positive for the virus (they claimed to
take the samples at random without regard to if the cow was showing
symptoms or not), so even if the dairies have been taking out the cows
with symptoms, most of the infected cows are still contributing to the
milk supply. Most states haven't even tried to identify their infected
herds.
Ron Okimoto