evolution ?

[Dale]

God is the Eternal Universe ?

There is Universal determinism ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

Cause and effect ?

Does God's consciousness differ a cause already put in place ?

Impermanence is just an effect ?

Complete impermanence has no permanence to scatter ?

Multiverse would only be an impermanence of the Universe ?

God would be the cause of evolution as well ?

Does God just put good karma evolution into place considering all
identities ?

Those identities are the parts of God/Universe ?

God is an identity to consider ?


Here are some of my lately thoughts ...

https://www.dalekelly.org/weblog.html#text

[JTEM]

Post by Dale
God is the Eternal Universe ?
There is Universal determinism ?

The universe is an illusion or, if you prefer, a delusion.

It is literally impossible.

Take a bottle, suck out all the air, creating the perfect
vacuum, seal it & wait five hours. If you come back to
find the bottle occupied by a small rabbit, seal intact,
THAT'S still less of an impossibility than the universe
existing... you being alive... these words appearing on
your screen.

Impossible. Utterly impossible to exist, this universe.

[Athel Cornish-Bowden]

Post by Dale
God is the Eternal Universe ?
There is Universal determinism ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
Cause and effect ?
Does God's consciousness differ a cause already put in place ?
Impermanence is just an effect ?
Complete impermanence has no permanence to scatter ?
Multiverse would only be an impermanence of the Universe ?
God would be the cause of evolution as well ?
Does God just put good karma evolution into place considering all identities ?
Those identities are the parts of God/Universe ?
God is an identity to consider ?
Here are some of my lately thoughts ...

Isn't "thoughts" rather a grand term for what you post?

Post by Dale
https://www.dalekelly.org/weblog.html#text

[LDagget]

Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden

Post by Dale
God is the Eternal Universe ?
There is Universal determinism ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
Cause and effect ?
Does God's consciousness differ a cause already put in place ?
Impermanence is just an effect ?
Complete impermanence has no permanence to scatter ?
Multiverse would only be an impermanence of the Universe ?
God would be the cause of evolution as well ?
Does God just put good karma evolution into place considering all identities ?
Those identities are the parts of God/Universe ?
God is an identity to consider ?
Here are some of my lately thoughts ...

Isn't "thoughts" rather a grand term for what you post?

Post by Dale
https://www.dalekelly.org/weblog.html#text

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28969900/
Semantic incongruity attracts attention at a pre-conscious
level: Evidence from a TMS study
Javier Ortiz-Tudela, Elisa Martín-Arévalo, Ana B Chica, Juan Lupiáñez
Cortex . 2018 May:102:96-106

Crude reduction: if shown two photographs of a typical suburban
backyard, one with a dog and one with a tiger, most people are
more likely to take quick notice of the tiger than the dog
because of what is termed a semantic incongruity. That's fancy
terminology for a context mismatch. Dogs are a commonly
occurring feature of suburban backyards while tigers are not.

Extending this, many who read Dale's "thoughts" will have their
attention shocked by the tigers scattered throughout. It is
much the same if you read someone writing about smelling colors,
or seeing scents.

It appears that the reaction to such things arises at a pre-
conscious level and would normally be filtered out by processing
of a normal healthy mind that was composing a set of thoughts.

Some consciously push against such filtering, with or without
the aid of psychoactive pharmaceuticals. This is perhaps good
for some poets but dangerous in the hands of Vogons.

A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?

It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

[Bob Casanova]

On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget

Post by Athel Cornish-Bowden

Post by Dale
God is the Eternal Universe ?
There is Universal determinism ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism
Cause and effect ?
Does God's consciousness differ a cause already put in place ?
Impermanence is just an effect ?
Complete impermanence has no permanence to scatter ?
Multiverse would only be an impermanence of the Universe ?
God would be the cause of evolution as well ?
Does God just put good karma evolution into place considering all identities ?
Those identities are the parts of God/Universe ?
God is an identity to consider ?
Here are some of my lately thoughts ...

Isn't "thoughts" rather a grand term for what you post?

Post by Dale
https://www.dalekelly.org/weblog.html#text

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28969900/
Semantic incongruity attracts attention at a pre-conscious
level: Evidence from a TMS study
Javier Ortiz-Tudela, Elisa Martín-Arévalo, Ana B Chica, Juan Lupiáñez
Cortex . 2018 May:102:96-106
Crude reduction: if shown two photographs of a typical suburban
backyard, one with a dog and one with a tiger, most people are
more likely to take quick notice of the tiger than the dog
because of what is termed a semantic incongruity. That's fancy
terminology for a context mismatch. Dogs are a commonly
occurring feature of suburban backyards while tigers are not.

It could also be that, while dogs are generally companion
but *may* be dangerous to humans, tigers definitely are.
"Key on the threat" is fairly well documented.

Post by LDagget
Extending this, many who read Dale's "thoughts" will have their
attention shocked by the tigers scattered throughout. It is
much the same if you read someone writing about smelling colors,
or seeing scents.

Dale's "thoughts" could well be nonexistent.

Post by LDagget
It appears that the reaction to such things arises at a pre-
conscious level and would normally be filtered out by processing
of a normal healthy mind that was composing a set of thoughts.
Some consciously push against such filtering, with or without
the aid of psychoactive pharmaceuticals. This is perhaps good
for some poets but dangerous in the hands of Vogons.
A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

[LDagget]

Post by Bob Casanova
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget
A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

Fair game I suppose, and I'm disinclined to wage a political
proxy fight here. But I will ask you to consider two potential
hells where one is sentenced to diagramming the sentences of
46 or 47. One is infamous for verbal gaffs but that's in part
because they can be found amidst a mostly coherent background.
Moreover, one recognizes when they verbally stumble while the
other plays cover-up games and blames those who noticed.
You may have a last word if you feel the need, I won't continue.

[jillery]

Post by LDagget

Post by Bob Casanova
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget
A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

Biden? Trump and his toadies are still blaming Obama.

Post by LDagget
Fair game I suppose, and I'm disinclined to wage a political
proxy fight here. But I will ask you to consider two potential
hells where one is sentenced to diagramming the sentences of
46 or 47. One is infamous for verbal gaffs but that's in part
because they can be found amidst a mostly coherent background.
Moreover, one recognizes when they verbally stumble while the
other plays cover-up games and blames those who noticed.
You may have a last word if you feel the need, I won't continue.

I suppose it's best to let this willfully stupid troll rest in peace.

[JTEM]

Post by jillery
Biden? Trump and his toadies are still blaming Obama.

O'BumHole was a shitty President. But disturbs me is that he
stole the nomination in plain sight and idiots like you just
agreed to "Forget" what you saw with your own eyes...

Remember when they disenfranchised Florida and Michigan to
take the early lead away from Hillary, and how much later they
gave a bunch of those delegates -- which Obama won ZERO -- to
O'BumHole? Or how Hillary won Texas and O'BumHole got more
delegates? There was at least one other state where they did
that... Nevada? I don't remember.

Then there were the random "Bonus" delegates they lavished on
O'BumHole.

Oo! Remember the "Reverend Wright" scandal? That was all fake.
In fact, they ran it in 2007 and nobody cared, nobody paid
attention and then they re-ran it in 2008.

Why? Because it was cover for O'BumHole being a Muslim!

Oo! What about NAFTA? O'BumHole stumped for his campaign,
promising to re-negotiate NAFTA and then told the Canadian
government he was just lying to the voters. How did the media
report that one? Oh, yes: "HILLARY LIED!"

Shit stains obeyed the media, dutifully ignored what they were
seeing and if you remember half of this stuff, well, I don't
believe you.

Are you even going to Google any of it?

You don't care. Your mental illness can't accept being wrong
or stupid... better to live in the dark, right?

[Bob Casanova]

On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:18:12 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget

Post by Bob Casanova
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget
A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

Fair game I suppose

;-)

Post by LDagget
, and I'm disinclined to wage a political
proxy fight here. But I will ask you to consider two potential
hells where one is sentenced to diagramming the sentences of
46 or 47. One is infamous for verbal gaffs but that's in part
because they can be found amidst a mostly coherent background.
Moreover, one recognizes when they verbally stumble while the
other plays cover-up games and blames those who noticed.
You may have a last word if you feel the need, I won't continue.

Nah; political "discussions" never go anywhere but down, and
are off-topic here anyway.

Have a good rest of the week, and a good weekend.

[jillery]

Post by Bob Casanova
On Wed, 16 Apr 2025 11:18:12 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget

Post by Bob Casanova
On Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:22:11 +0000, the following appeared

Post by LDagget
A lack of semantic filtering seems like a good diagnostic of
some challenging neurological conditions. Are the incongruities
not noticed? Noticed but not filtered?
It might all seem like navel gazing if it weren't for some very
significant examples of semantic incongruities frequently
spewing forth from Executive Functionaries with little apparent
executive function (non-functioning filters). Bigly.

Biden's gone, let him rest in peace.

Fair game I suppose

;-)

Post by LDagget
, and I'm disinclined to wage a political
proxy fight here. But I will ask you to consider two potential
hells where one is sentenced to diagramming the sentences of
46 or 47. One is infamous for verbal gaffs but that's in part
because they can be found amidst a mostly coherent background.
Moreover, one recognizes when they verbally stumble while the
other plays cover-up games and blames those who noticed.
You may have a last word if you feel the need, I won't continue.

Nah; political "discussions" never go anywhere but down, and
are off-topic here anyway.

So it's ok for you to start off-topic political "discussions". So
much for your "no worries" advice to Kestrel.

Post by Bob Casanova
Have a good rest of the week, and a good weekend.